|
| Page 1, 2, 3 |
Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>>
|
G. House
User ID: 821222
 United States
11/18/2009 12:10 AM
 | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Well, maybe one.
Here's one of my favorite photos.
By someone VERY famous and a well documented shot taken in 1954.
[link to www.anseladams.com]
Now being that Adams probably took this shot somewhere out west, I would think the aircraft in question were military and probably doing maneuvers which accounts for the many turns.
But the real point is that photos and videos ARE available which illustrate that the cornerstone of chemtrail belief is AGAIN a BALD FACED LIE.
Last Edited by G. House on 11/18/2009 at 12:12 AM |
|
Nighthawk
User ID: 817436
United States
11/18/2009 12:30 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Well, maybe one.
Here's one of my favorite photos.
By someone VERY famous and a well documented shot taken in 1954.
[ link to www.anseladams.com]
Now being that Adams probably took this shot somewhere out west, I would think the aircraft in question were military and probably doing maneuvers which accounts for the many turns.
But the real point is that photos and videos ARE available which illustrate that the cornerstone of chemtrail belief is AGAIN a BALD FACED LIE.
Cue the chemtard dismissal of the pic in 5...4...3...
[link to www.youtube.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 818151
United States
11/18/2009 12:36 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
They've been playin with chemtrails since the mid 30's.
They didn't become common place until the late 90's. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 818151
United States
11/18/2009 12:37 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
BTW in inlaw family member was a student and good friend of ansel adams. |
|
2cents 
Question everything !
User ID: 817567
United States
11/18/2009 6:46 PM
 | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Prove it!
No need.
In the past I have done this countless times.
Always ignored.
YOU people believe whatever you wish.
It is a futile endeavor. Quoting: G. House
Wonderful, now...would you please quit posting. |
|
Winningjob
Create YOUR reality
User ID: 385114
United States
11/18/2009 6:49 PM
 | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Again...
we've provided that info countless times before.
You can find this stuff if you really wanted to.
Believe whatever the hell you want. Quoting: G. House
WTF is this?
No one says "WE" Neither the contrail or chemtrail people or others..so I would love to hear your explanation.
"I'd rather die fighting on my own terms with a rifle in my hands, than to die whimpering and begging for mercy in some ditch with my hands tied behind my back."
- James Wesley, Rawles |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 6:49 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Well, maybe one.
Here's one of my favorite photos.
By someone VERY famous and a well documented shot taken in 1954.
[ link to www.anseladams.com]
Now being that Adams probably took this shot somewhere out west, I would think the aircraft in question were military and probably doing maneuvers which accounts for the many turns.
But the real point is that photos and videos ARE available which illustrate that the cornerstone of chemtrail belief is AGAIN a BALD FACED LIE.
always the circles & military planes.
1/2 dozen photos and 1 minute of video over 4 decades
not very impressive body of work. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 6:51 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
They've been playin with chemtrails since the mid 30's.
They didn't become common place until the late 90's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 818151
very possible and likely. sure much testing was done before hand. |
|
Jesus N Pals
User ID: 648948
 Canada
11/18/2009 6:53 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
O.K...Lets agree to disagree on the contrails/chemtrails spreading and turning into "cirrus" clouds.
Believe it or not, some here on GLP have an open mind and are willing to listen as long as the name calling stops.
I took the time to read all your post and your links and your commentary on the other threads and added that to the "allegations" made
in Carnicom's video "Aerosol Crimes" and what I have witnessed in the sky and on the ground for the past several years.
***Again, I don't want this to be about "contrails" vs. "chemtrails" or how or why they form and spread.***
Did any of you watch this video?
[ link to video.google.com]
Did you see the list of corporations and government angencies that began to monitor his website?
Does any of that not raise questions even if only 25 percent of it were factual?
Do jet engines burn as pure as you guys imply and the only exhaust is heat which then creates these wonderful and harmless contrails.
If the materials analyzed in the video which definately fell from the sky, how did they get there and why do they contain these materials that are harmful to us?
Why would the EPA not be interested in this stuff floating in the air regardless of how it got there?
Why are there so many patents and applications for aircraft delivery of a variety of substances?
Why, if for weather modification only, do they refuse to acknowledge it?
Harmful "stuff" is floating around in the air we are breathing, what are we going to do about it?
Thanks for your time.
until you people stop using the word chemtrails, no one will never take you seriously,,,
they are AEROSOLS |
|
2cents
Question everything !
User ID: 817567
United States
11/18/2009 6:55 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
O.K...Lets agree to disagree on the contrails/chemtrails spreading and turning into "cirrus" clouds.
Believe it or not, some here on GLP have an open mind and are willing to listen as long as the name calling stops.
I took the time to read all your post and your links and your commentary on the other threads and added that to the "allegations" made
in Carnicom's video "Aerosol Crimes" and what I have witnessed in the sky and on the ground for the past several years.
***Again, I don't want this to be about "contrails" vs. "chemtrails" or how or why they form and spread.***
Did any of you watch this video?
[ link to video.google.com]
Did you see the list of corporations and government angencies that began to monitor his website?
Does any of that not raise questions even if only 25 percent of it were factual?
Do jet engines burn as pure as you guys imply and the only exhaust is heat which then creates these wonderful and harmless contrails.
If the materials analyzed in the video which definately fell from the sky, how did they get there and why do they contain these materials that are harmful to us?
Why would the EPA not be interested in this stuff floating in the air regardless of how it got there?
Why are there so many patents and applications for aircraft delivery of a variety of substances?
Why, if for weather modification only, do they refuse to acknowledge it?
Harmful "stuff" is floating around in the air we are breathing, what are we going to do about it?
Thanks for your time.
until you people stop using the word chemtrails, no one will never take you seriously,,,
they are AEROSOLS
Agreed, aerosols containing what? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 6:55 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Well, maybe one.
Here's one of my favorite photos.
By someone VERY famous and a well documented shot taken in 1954.
[ link to www.anseladams.com]
Now being that Adams probably took this shot somewhere out west, I would think the aircraft in question were military and probably doing maneuvers which accounts for the many turns.
But the real point is that photos and videos ARE available which illustrate that the cornerstone of chemtrail belief is AGAIN a BALD FACED LIE.
Bald face? that's funny peepants  |
|
G. House
User ID: 821766
United States
11/18/2009 7:09 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Again...
we've provided that info countless times before.
You can find this stuff if you really wanted to.
Believe whatever the hell you want.
WTF is this?
No one says "WE" Neither the contrail or chemtrail people or others..so I would love to hear your explanation. Quoting: Winningjob
We?
OK, The Guy, Duncan Kunz, Me, and quite a few others have been providing REAL information for years.
And YOU, Winningjob, I am sure have read most of it many times.
So then we post it again, and basically it's ignored and followed by exercises in nebulosity.
In fact I've for the most part come to the conclusion that most so-called chemtrail believers don't really believe anyway. They post just to shock and upset people.
NOBODY could really be as stupid as DarkStarCrashes in real life (and be a lawyer besides? give me a break).
It's all stupid role playing. |
|
G. House
User ID: 821766
United States
11/18/2009 7:11 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Agreed, aerosols containing what? Quoting: 2cents
I would hazard a guess that you really don't understand what an aerosol is in the first place or where the majority of them come from. |
|
Jesus N Pals
User ID: 648948
Canada
11/18/2009 7:12 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
O.K...Lets agree to disagree on the contrails/chemtrails spreading and turning into "cirrus" clouds.
Believe it or not, some here on GLP have an open mind and are willing to listen as long as the name calling stops.
I took the time to read all your post and your links and your commentary on the other threads and added that to the "allegations" made
in Carnicom's video "Aerosol Crimes" and what I have witnessed in the sky and on the ground for the past several years.
***Again, I don't want this to be about "contrails" vs. "chemtrails" or how or why they form and spread.***
Did any of you watch this video?
[ link to video.google.com]
Did you see the list of corporations and government angencies that began to monitor his website?
Does any of that not raise questions even if only 25 percent of it were factual?
Do jet engines burn as pure as you guys imply and the only exhaust is heat which then creates these wonderful and harmless contrails.
If the materials analyzed in the video which definately fell from the sky, how did they get there and why do they contain these materials that are harmful to us?
Why would the EPA not be interested in this stuff floating in the air regardless of how it got there?
Why are there so many patents and applications for aircraft delivery of a variety of substances?
Why, if for weather modification only, do they refuse to acknowledge it?
Harmful "stuff" is floating around in the air we are breathing, what are we going to do about it?
Thanks for your time.
until you people stop using the word chemtrails, no one will never take you seriously,,,
they are AEROSOLS
Agreed, aerosols containing what?
it involves NUCLEI....... |
|
G. House
User ID: 821766
United States
11/18/2009 7:21 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Prove it!
No need.
In the past I have done this countless times.
Always ignored.
YOU people believe whatever you wish.
It is a futile endeavor.
Wonderful, now...would you please quit posting. Quoting: 2cents
This is your thread and if YOU remember, YOU saw fit to mention MY NAME in your posts.
Innocent ME, who was not participating in the thread at that time.
YOU asked for it.
Now you have it. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 821826
United States
11/18/2009 7:37 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Prove it!
No need.
In the past I have done this countless times.
Always ignored.
YOU people believe whatever you wish.
It is a futile endeavor. Quoting: G. House
And yet....
Here you are again. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 821826
United States
11/18/2009 7:42 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Again...
we've provided that info countless times before.
You can find this stuff if you really wanted to.
Believe whatever the hell you want.
WTF is this?
No one says "WE" Neither the contrail or chemtrail people or others..so I would love to hear your explanation.
We?
OK, The Guy, Duncan Kunz, Me, and quite a few others have been providing REAL information for years.
And YOU, Winningjob, I am sure have read most of it many times.
So then we post it again, and basically it's ignored and followed by exercises in nebulosity.
In fact I've for the most part come to the conclusion that most so-called chemtrail believers don't really believe anyway. They post just to shock and upset people.
NOBODY could really be as stupid as DarkStarCrashes in real life (and be a lawyer besides? give me a break).
It's all stupid role playing. Quoting: G. House
Quote:
"OK, The Guy, Duncan Kunz, Me, and quite a few others have been providing REAL information for years."
You slimy maggots have been providing real information mixed with a whole lot of BS, and glaring omissions. You are the absolute lowest form of scum on the planet.
If you REALLY don't care is we "believe whatever we want", and you really ARE "tired" of trying to convince people of the "truth" (yeah right!), then I must ask again...
Just what in the hell are you DOING here on this thread?
Why are you SOOOOOO damn predictable? All of you slimeballs are. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 821826
United States
11/18/2009 7:43 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Type-o correction...
Should read: "IF we believe" ^^^^ |
|
Winningjob
Create YOUR reality
User ID: 385114
United States
11/18/2009 7:54 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
It's all stupid role playing. Quoting: G. House
Yes, GLP does seem to have role playing and sometimes it is obvious and other times questionable.
Whether someone agrees/disagrees with or doesn't care..I am at least real and hide nothing..so contrail people/chemtrail people and whatever people should take that to heart.
Last Edited by Winningjob on 11/18/2009 at 7:55 PM
"I'd rather die fighting on my own terms with a rifle in my hands, than to die whimpering and begging for mercy in some ditch with my hands tied behind my back."
- James Wesley, Rawles |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 8:36 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
It's all stupid role playing.
Yes, GLP does seem to have role playing and sometimes it is obvious and other times questionable.
Whether someone agrees/disagrees with or doesn't care..I am at least real and hide nothing..so contrail people/chemtrail people and whatever people should take that to heart. Quoting: Winningjob
 Go Team Evil |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 821826
United States
11/18/2009 8:39 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Prove it!
No need.
In the past I have done this countless times.
Always ignored.
YOU people believe whatever you wish.
It is a futile endeavor. Quoting: G. House
Your tenacity and dedication PROVES that you DESPERATELY care what people think, and wish to disuade them from believing in the OBVIOUS. And the OBVIOUS is this:
The FULL-SCALE program did not start until 1998. There have been isolated testing going on for MANY years, but this operation did not start in earnest, until '98.
Your presence (and The Guy, and Nighthawk, and Kunz, etc...) on these threads is so predictable, that there is no way that you AREN'T a paid disinfo slug. You just can't seem to leave them alone, and yet you ALL claim to be "disinterested" in what people "want" to believe.
I've dealt with you low-life scum since the program began, and I've seen WAYYYYYY more than enough proof to know that this aerosol operation is absolutely real, and that you people are paid LIARS.
But the thing that allows me to sleep at night, is the fact that your deceiving is only temporary. You (and those like you) will have your part in the Lake which burns with fire. Your sarcasm, your lies, and your traitorous nature will be no more. God is in control. Your days are numbered. Just like the days of the one you serve. |
|
Winningjob
Create YOUR reality
User ID: 385114
United States
11/18/2009 8:46 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
It's all stupid role playing.
Yes, GLP does seem to have role playing and sometimes it is obvious and other times questionable.
Whether someone agrees/disagrees with or doesn't care..I am at least real and hide nothing..so contrail people/chemtrail people and whatever people should take that to heart.
Go Team Evil
What is wrong with you?
"I'd rather die fighting on my own terms with a rifle in my hands, than to die whimpering and begging for mercy in some ditch with my hands tied behind my back."
- James Wesley, Rawles |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 8:51 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
It's all stupid role playing.
Yes, GLP does seem to have role playing and sometimes it is obvious and other times questionable.
Whether someone agrees/disagrees with or doesn't care..I am at least real and hide nothing..so contrail people/chemtrail people and whatever people should take that to heart.
Go Team Evil
What is wrong with you?
nothing. why is there something wrong? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 8:52 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
 |
|
2cents
Question everything !
User ID: 817567
United States
11/18/2009 8:54 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Agreed, aerosols containing what?
I would hazard a guess that you really don't understand what an aerosol is in the first place or where the majority of them come from. Quoting: G. House
Aerosol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Aerosol-Technically, an aerosol is a suspension of fine solid particles or liquid droplets in a gas. Examples are smoke, oceanic haze, air pollution, smog and CS gas. In general conversation, aerosol usually refers to an aerosol spray can or the output of such a can. The word aerosol derives from the fact that matter "floating" in air is a suspension (a mixture in which solid or liquid or combined solid-liquid particles are suspended in a fluid). To differentiate suspensions from true solutions, the term sol evolved—originally meant to cover dispersions of tiny (sub-microscopic) particles in a liquid. With studies of dispersions in air, the term aerosol evolved and now embraces both liquid droplets, solid particles, and combinations of these. |
|
2cents
Question everything !
User ID: 817567
United States
11/18/2009 8:56 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Prove it!
No need.
In the past I have done this countless times.
Always ignored.
YOU people believe whatever you wish.
It is a futile endeavor.
Wonderful, now...would you please quit posting.
This is your thread and if YOU remember, YOU saw fit to mention MY NAME in your posts.
Innocent ME, who was not participating in the thread at that time.
YOU asked for it.
Now you have it. Quoting: G. House
You told us to believe whatever we wish...so SHUT UP! |
|
Winningjob
Create YOUR reality
User ID: 385114
United States
11/18/2009 9:14 PM
| | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
Go Team Evil
What is wrong with you?
nothing. why is there something wrong?
Not that I know of?
Let me see:
Cheap Beer (check)
Cable/Internet Still Works (check)
Had Dinner (check)
Car hidden from possible repo man (check)
Looks good!
"I'd rather die fighting on my own terms with a rifle in my hands, than to die whimpering and begging for mercy in some ditch with my hands tied behind my back."
- James Wesley, Rawles |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 621262
United States
11/18/2009 10:42 PM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
OK, The Guy, Duncan Kunz, Me, and quite a few others have been providing REAL information for years. Quoting: G. House
the guy? really?
this guy?
THE QUESTION:
soooooo.....after seeing this line in 1986, thinking it was a rocket and not seeing another one for the rest of the 1980s, when did you see one again?
THE GUY'S ANSWER:
I don't know. I stopped paying attention until 2007. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 721505
United States
11/19/2009 12:33 AM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
I would hazard a guess that you really don't understand what an aerosol is in the first place or where the majority of them come from. Quoting: G. House
Gee, House,
Everybody nose aerosol is just pinesol with the pine removed, leaving only the fresh scent of aer behind! |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 822020
United States
11/19/2009 12:34 AM | | Re: Chemtrails: (or not) Agree to Disagree >>>>>>>>>>>> | Quote |
 |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3 |
|
